Riordan Wiki:Requests for Adminship

This is the page where formal requests for administratorship are recorded and archived. An explanation of what sysop rights are can be found below the list of admins at Project:Administrators.

Requirements
There are no concrete requirements for a user to be an admin. However, admins will usually:
 * Have a very strong history of contributions (including the content namespace), though quality is more important than quantity
 * Be trusted by the community
 * Have no history of serious blocks due to vandalism or sockpuppetry

Procedures

 * Users must have 50 edits and be a regular contributor for a month to be able to vote or nominate.
 * Users who have been absent for extended periods of time (3 months or more) will be considered as "new users" for the purposes of RfA and must make 50 edits and be contributor for a further month before voting.
 * Users must have rollback rights to be nominated for adminship.

Stage 1: Nominating

 * 1) Users may nominate themselves for adminship.
 * 2) Users may not nominate each other (e.g. A can't nominate B and B nominate A in the same RfA)
 * 3) There can be more than one request at a time. However, a user can't nominate more than one user at a time (e.g. A can't nominate B and C).

Stage 2: Voting

 * 1) Users may vote in support, be neutral, or oppose the adminship nomination. Users must provide a reason behind their position.
 * 2) Everyone's vote counts as one vote. Admins do not hold extra power.
 * 3) The vote will last until there is enough feedback to decide.
 * 4) Bureaucrats may close votes early at their discretion if the applicant is obviously unsuitable with no chance of succeeding. Voters may also request this if they believe the applicant has no chance of succeeding.
 * 5) Once there is enough feedback, the active Bureaucrat will determine whether consensus has been reached. This means that admin requests require at least a two-thirds support rate to pass. Strength of argument is more important than the number of votes.

Current Requests
Currently, requests for adminship are: Open.

SayuriDarling
Shortage...again, but i think she would be a good admin, as she edited since 2009. She also edits daily and improves the wiki pages. :)  Athletiger Talk~Diana Chen 22:11, November 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * I support. She has been here longer than any admin and she's really nice. Plus the things Athletiger stated above Mεηαrα  ~ The one you least expect  22:34, November 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * I support. She is an awesome person. She is really fun and nice. Plus, She's been here since 2009, and well, everything everyone else said Superandombro (talk &bull; contribs) 03:39, November 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * I support this user but Sayuri herself has told me that she would be hesitant towards adminshipMaimer1882 (talk &bull; contribs) 14:35, November 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Per above, but Sayuri told me that she doesn't think that she is ready for adminship herself, you should make sure that she actually wants admin before nominating. -- 01:50, December 11, 2011 (UTC)