Board Thread:Antaeus' Arena: Audience Chamber/@comment-1515612-20160831210703/@comment-5414004-20160918122523

MeatFaceFTW wrote: I'm tired of seeing the "he/she would've in battle" as an argument to nulify a person's power. Absence of evidence is NOT evidence of absence. Especially since things like Percy bloodbending is accepted for these fights despite him never doing it and in case someone says he's controlled things partially composed of water before like poison, I'm aware of this but he never bloodbent. This happens with Hazel controlling a weapon to injure their owner and now with Sam's invisibility.