Board Thread:Antaeus' Arena: Audience Chamber/@comment-4531192-20140102134332/@comment-15861170-20140103020154

JasonGrace1776 wrote: Romans were better inventors than the Greeks. For example remember how the 1st ironclad was made by ROMANS. Some Romans are able to fight by themselves too like shown in the MoA Excuse me?!?! EXCUSE ME?!!? Go read a book on Archimedes. Who fled when they saw a rope on a wall and thought it was a terifying trick? THE ROMANS. Who invented a claw that could pick ships up out of the water? ARCHIMEDES. Who was he? AH GREEK. (who killed the most awesome guy in history? The Romans because Romans are jerks) Just because the Romans have nice archictectue does not make them good inventors. Neither does being able to pack up their entire city. *cough* cowards *cough* While impressive no doubt, it just shows that they are good at taking their own city apart.

I can see why you might side with the Romans. They're the city of an empire and what not. But there are a lot of ways that the Romans aren't so great.

1. They're copy cats. Go make up your own Mythology if you're gonna conquer the world.

2. That giant empire got reduced to a city. A large one, but they got cut down from all the way up by modern day England to a CITY.

3. Romans are too strict, and mostly they fight in groups. Campp HAlf Blood would DOMINATE them because we can fight solo. The 7 obviously fight different.

Really, I could go on an on, but my response is getting kind of lengthy.