User blog comment:Atelda/Cabins/@comment-4640327-20120712165950

Although I like the idea of making cabins useful, this wouldn't solve the current problem as cabins would have to be dissolved and recreated with its new purposes, new political structure and all that crap. What I'm saying is: we would elminate the current theoretical powers and duties of cabins and make new ones completely different.

Second topic. How could we say an article belongs to that person? All the articles we've are based in co-writing and mostly the original writter has little to do with its current look. So deciding nominations would be a hard job and we might have big discussions about it. Also, if counselor starts to benefit people that are his friends or nice to him?

Assuming this problem is solved, don't u think people would be unhappy if the article they've been editing for three months is said to be bad written? They would be sad, angry or both which wouldn't be very good for the wiki in general.

If I'm mistaken I apologize but if not, there are some points we still have to consider. I do think we should make changes, my point is: we must consider wisely the options.