Board Thread:Antaeus' Arena: Audience Chamber/@comment-1515612-20161222000051/@comment-24067344-20170115083838

TheViralSorceress wrote: My goodness, Marc, did you start yet another civil war? You need to understand what the rest are trying to tell you about Piper not standing a chance in this fight. No offense, but your bias is really showing. I know you might not like Leo much, and hate Piper a lot more, but when it comes to Piper, the hate becomes ridiculous. I showed an entire post, in fact basically an essay of factual evidence that Piper isn't as weak or useless like most think, and that she has a chance to even beat Leo with her charmspeak alone. And even worse, most didn't really even come up with a argument good enough against my arguments, and you're saying that Marc has to understand that Piper cant win because most of them say so? I'm not saying my arguments or his are better than anyone esle's, cause it probably isn't. But in a debate, you look at both of the sides, and not just in one. You open your mind and understand what the other sides say that disagrees with you, and from what I see, not a single one has counter-argued my arguments, yet. I'm just gonna say the majority isn;t always right. Plus, from what I've seen in this debate was mostly a mixture of some facts with lots of speculating, which makes it even worse. You want Marc to understand what some are saying that Piper can't win is because of loose facts and speculation? Now, maybe I'm baised as well, but what I've learned from the internet, hate against a person or thing will always be overblown, and will always be exaggerated. I can call this debate more or less a circle-jerk, and to be honest, there are many great debaters in this wiki. But the Piper circle-jerk hate has gotten to ridiculous, so you saying to Marc to understand what the other side is just plain bad debating. I thought you'd know better about this. Sorry for my tone, but I had to say it. Many had valid points why Leo would win, but not to the extent where Piper stands no chance like you said. That is pure bias and hatred for a character right there, when at least some like me gave factual evidence and arguments where no one else really counter-argued or debated.