Board Thread:Antaeus' Arena: Audience Chamber/@comment-25184334-20140613210619/@comment-30269377-20140616165718

Jasonrules wrote: Yuri Bara wrote:

Jasonrules wrote:

Yuri Bara wrote: Percy. Percy's water could beat Leo's fire. There doesn't have a to be a lake for water to appear, Percy could just use the sewer water. It doesn't matter if Leo will evaporate the water before it touch him, beside newyork could be set on fire and Leo is immune to fire so he could win while percy tries to exctinguish the fire before it gets to him. I think Leo is still pretty inexperienced with his flames. I think making his fire powerful enough to evaporate Percy's water would take some concentration, and thus making him lose some valuable time. I'm still with Percy because he could just surround him and Leo with water, putting out the weaker flames and distracting Leo.Plus, can't Percy create earthquakes too? That's a good distraction too. I'm not saying Percy would automatically win, but in the end, I believe he would beat Leo. what are you talking about? if that counts then have you calculated how much energy percy would use to summon water out of thin air? plus Leo would be stupid to just hit percy with the flame he created, so he would set newyork on fire and the fire will spread like a diease and percy have to use every single bit of hi willpower dodging the flames while Leo enjoys the show. and eventually either Leo would get bored and summon flames to burn percy or percy would ran out of energy and get burn, either way Leo wins. If Leo had the power to set an entire city on fire, he would've easily won his fight with Clytius. He did not.